The Cynical Libertarian Society :: Link to 204EastSouth :: the Mind of The Great One
|
|
|
|
The Cynical Libertarian Society :: Link to 204EastSouth :: the Mind of The Great One
|
|
|
|
All hail the messiah
Obama, Obama
The path to the new socialist motherland
Our savior, our savior
Obama, Obama
The leader more famous than Lindsay Lohan
Bow down and praise the one
Give him your money and your guns
Give us a country
That makes your wife proud
Lord Barry heal the bitter ones
White and Clinging to faith and to guns
Hope for the change of the hope of the change!
The title of this next clip, as it was presented on YouTube, is:
Ann Coulter calls Hussein Obama "half black"
I'm not sure what is so bad about this, since Hussein is half black. Yet as we have established when talking about Hussein Obama there are two things you're not allowed to talk about, number one he's black - number two, his middle name is Hussein.
Go ahead and start the movie.
The first thing we've established here is that Ann Coulter is not all that funny. The next thing we established is that making a statement of verifiable fact pisses off liberals. Like it or not, Hussein Obama was born, and he was born half black. Both of these are empirically verifiable scientific facts. But then nothing pisses off a liberal as much as reality.
The next one is titled Ann Coulter crazy on the today show. Let's see just how "crazy" she really is.
The first question is "do you believe everything in the book or did you just put some of that in there?" This is exactly the sort of question you would expect from a liberal, because of course when a liberal writes a book they include a bunch of shit that they don't actually believe. One thing you can say for the right wing nut cases is that when they write a book they usually write the things they actually believe. They don't screw around. Liberals on the other hand, when they write a book they're writing the things that they want people to believe that they believe so that they can get elected.
She is dead right about what she calls the leftist "doctrine of infallibility" and how they use this to protect themselves from attack. Any time you disagree with somebody who is a liberal or a Democrat it can never be about the disagreement. Liberals always twist it around so that you're attacking somebody for their skin colour, or attacking somebody because their mommy was an alcoholic, or attacking them because they're poor, or attacking them because of their lack of education. Whenever somebody attacks a liberal it's never about the liberal's ideas (as if liberals have ideas), it's always about skin colour or background or minority status or something like that.
And here's another point. How does losing a husband in the 9/11 attack make you an expert on foreign-policy? This is another example of how liberals take victim groups and turned them into experts. "My father was an alcoholic, therefore I'm an expert on alcoholism." "My husband was killed by the 9/11 attack, therefore I'm a foreign-policy expert." "I was raised in a slum, therefore I'm an expert on how to clean up the slum."
And yes, these women are rich, and these women are rich for the same reason that their husbands are dead. The video clip is over and I still didn't see the part where she "goes crazy". I think it has more to do with the fact that liberals hate people who think different.
I love this next one, here we see Ann Coulter campaigning for Hillary Clinton. Of course the more I think about it, now that she has put the idea in my head, Hillary may in fact have been a better candidate than John McCain. Ann says that Hillary would have been more conservative. I'm not sure she would have been conservative overall, but in some areas I think there's a real possibility that could've been true.
Here's Ann, on the Hannity and Combs show again, defending Hillary, despite Hillary being on her way out. I also just take this opportunity to mention that Sean Hannity is a complete moron. Sometimes I agree with Ann, sometimes I disagree with Ann, and sometimes Ann is a moron, but at least she's entertaining most of the time. Sean, on the other hand, I agree with a lot less, he's wrong a lot more often, and he's not really all that entertaining. Anyhow, start the video and watch Ann "compare Obama to Hitler".
"John McCain has been in Congress for 150 years and what has he done about spending?" There's Ann making an excellent point about why John McCain, while he may or may not have been a better president than King Hussein, is still not what anybody in their right mind would call a good choice for the presidency.
Frighteningly enough Alan Combs of all people actually makes a good point. When he talks about how McCain opposed the tax cuts then when McCain supposedly saw the tax cuts worked he decided that he supports tax cuts. Since McCain's original judgement on the tax cuts wasn't very good, why should we trust his judgement in the future. This is not a bad observation. Somebody who's been alive as long as John McCain has and still continues to make stupid mistakes is probably going to continue to make stupid mistakes. If John McCain hasn't managed to get his judgement in alignment with reality by now it's not very likely that his judgement would've been in alignment with reality any time during the next four years.
Ann makes the mistake of calling Obama "racist". Get ready for the world to come to an end. In fact all the passages I've seen from Obama's book seem to indicate that in fact, yes, he does have a racial chip on his shoulder, and yes, he is offended by virtually everything that happens in the world around him, and yes, he has an attitude problem with white people.
Finally, I don't think anybody cares who Jane Fonda is supporting.
In this next clip the most important thing isn't any problem Ann has with Obama, the important thing is that she's right about the fact that we've got the worst presidential candidates we've had in a long time and the fact that the so-called campaign finance reform laws are simply making things worse.
She's dead right that Obama is like Chinese food. He does make a speech and after he's made the speech you have no idea what he said. And the man has been elected president of the United States based on not being Bush and being able to talk pretty. I've read the Blueprint for America and I still don't know what he said.
"We're gonna chage the world. Yes we can."
Hillary: As bad as she might have been, Obama might be worse.
Does anyone really want to have sex with somebody gullible enough to have voted for Obama? Of course then again, I'm only having sex with their bodies, not their brains. So maybe gullibility is a good thing.
Contact Page