---

Home <>----<> Photography <>----<> Muffins <>----<> Poetry, Prose & Politics <>----<> Purchase from On The Fly

The Cynical Libertarian Society

---

hits:

last updated: 25 JUL 04

Am I The Only Person On This Planet With Common Sense?

15 July 2000: I got a Nova video this week called Battle Alert in the Gulf. Mostly it’s a propaganda film about our continued assault on the Middle East, and for that reason I found it aggravating enuf. I wanted to see military technology in action (and there was some great footage of weapons of mass destruction) but I did not need more lectures on the evils of Sadam Insane. Here we see an illustration of one of the major problems of our world. Sadam in the evil one, but is anyone going to kill him? No.... because that would require someone to be a man. Instead we will kill lots of people who are either following orders (just like our military does) or civilians. Civilians always make good cannon fodder.
Of course, the truth of it all is that leaders of countries don’t try to kill each other because they somehow think they deserve to live & it is our duty to die for them. Well ass holes, wrong. See, when I become dictator of the world I have no intention of eliminating the existing political boarders or economic / political systems that are in place. However, when a dispute arrises, the solution will be arrived at by tossing the leaders of the involved countries in a pit with a few knives. Winner takes all. Implementing this system would mean an end to conflict between countries. Look at Israel. Every country around them wants to kill them. Why? Because the leaders of those countries don’t have to put their lives on the line, just the lives of their mindless minions. If they were in personal danger you would have peace in 60 seconds.
The second thing in this video that pissed me off was having to look at women in combat. Now this may come as a shock to you (this is sarcasm) but I don’t think women should be in the military. As strange as this may sound, the purpose of the military is not to be equal, the purpose of the military is to kill people. Women are simply not (generally speaking - there are always exceptions) good at killing people unless they are unborn children (abortion for the dumb people), or newly born (like having your baby in the bathroom & dropping it in the trash), or still very young & can not defend themselves (locking them in the car & pushing it in the river). Since women are unlikely to engage children on the battle field I don’t think they will prove very effective soldiers.
Anyhow, Nova made a big deal of the fact that the aircraft carrier USS Stennis (And by the way, who the hell is Stennis? Carriers should be named for people we have heard of, like Nimitz or Kennedy.) accommodates women. As if this were an advantage. Anyhow, we get to follow the exploits of this little bimbo chick who wants to be a yellow shirt. Yellow shirts are the men (yes, I said men) who guide the aircraft on the deck of the carrier & get them launched safely. This kid looks like she’s about 19 years old, 5 foot nothing and 98 pounds soaking wet. At one point we see her struggling to pull a bulkhead closed behind her. Yea, I always trust children with multi-million dollar aircraft armed with the most advanced weapons systems on Earth.
So we see her being tested by the yellow shirts to see if she is going to get to join them. They ask her the procedures for moving an aircraft with no breaks on the deck. She rattles off some stuff and one of the yellow shirts says “what did you forget?” She looks confused and finally answers. They then press her to explain why the procedures are as they are. “It’s not enough to know the procedures, you have to know why the procedures are, you have to know the reasons behind them.” She looks clueless. I’m scared. The scene cuts & it’s all over. She passed. She is now a yellow shirt, and she is bragging that she became a yellow shirt faster than anyone else on the ship, in something like 6 months. Not 6 months training to be a yellow shirt, but 6 months from stepping onto the carrier. But what the hell, I mean how important can experience be when doing something like this? She is all of 19 after all, and we know that 19 year old girls are very smart, cool & reasonable -- especially under pressure. And if she fucks up, it’s just going to kill people and endanger military operations if under actual combat situations. No big deal . . .
It’s sick. She is all happy & it’s so obvious that she was handed this job because she is a bitch... I mean woman. One of the yellow shirts even says about her “She knows just enough to be dangerous.” This is a military code phrase for “this person is an idiot”. I’m scared.

On the subject of sick, there is a news magazine called Insight. I use to subscribe to it, but no longer. It’s got a conservative/republican slant to it. I picked up a copy last week and while reading one article all I could do was keep saying to myself “that’s sick” over & over. Good thing I happened to be reading on the porcelain throne at the time, so I was in the right place. So what’s the story? Some manager at Coca-Cola put nude pictures of himself on the internet. My response to this is so what. There are all sorts of nude pictures on the internet, and all the people in those pictures work someplace... So how the hell is this an issue? But I suppose it is, which is kinda sad.
In this article (Corporate Image vs. Right to Privacy by Kelly Patricia O’Meara) Coca-Cola (CC - cause I’m lazy) is presented as “the ultimate squeaky-clean brand name”. Huh? Ok, whatever. So come along with me as I read this & comment on it.
Things are Ok at first, CC even says that what employees do on their own time is their business, especially since he didn’t mention the fact that he works for CC (which shows he has a life outside his job) but then the writer starts chiming in with some opinions. This dumb whore, I mean journalist, starts off by comparing this to Bill Klinton. “Of course this is just the argument that the defenders of President Clinton have made. And debate about whether men and women in positions of power and authority have the right to separate their private and professional lives still is raging.” Now, first off, I’m no English major, but I think this last string of words is not a sentence. Granted, I have tons of strings of words which are not sentences, but I’m not a dumb whore -- I mean journalist.
But let’s look at the important thing here. Kelly is comparing a middle manager at CC to the President of the United States. This reminds me of a time when a person standing right in front of me actually compared taking hostages & shooting one of them in the foot (the UNC “hostage crisis”) to jaywalking. Do you dumb ass fuckers have any sense? If you think a management puke at CC is the same thing as the president, you need to start your SUV up & wrap your lips around the tail pipe ‘cause you are never going to contribute anything to society or the world. I could try explaining this, but honestly -- if you are too dumb to figure this out on your own, get the hell off my web site.
Now Janet Parshall of the Family Research Council spouts off. I love this. “This man stepped into the public in this way to get a response. [Oh my god -- evil!!!] That is deviant behaviour. [What???] If he were nude in a public rest room he’d be arrested, but because he is doing it on the internet he thinks it isn’t a crime. We used to call that kind of behaviour indecent exposure.” Janet, the only indecency here is that your dumb whore ass is allowed to waste oxygen. I bet this whore would have convulsions if she ever saw a nude beach. Naked bodies are not the scary things you believe they are. We all have one you know. Granted yours is probably fat & ugly, but just because you are sexually repressed doesn’t mean everyone else is. Janet, in lieu of having a life, continues to spout sickness. “Such behaviour involves a minimisation of his job, when as an employee he is an ambassador of the corporation.” Excuse me while I heave . . .
Ok, I’m back. For so long I have been trying to explain to the stupid people (the population of the Earth minus 7) that the difference between the Republicans & the Democrats (that’s big R and big D) is nothing. Each party sees you as a slave. The Democrats see you as a slave to the government. The Republicans see you as a slave to your corporation. Either way you are a slave, does it really matter who the “massa” is? Look at that last quote closely and actually think about it. Something he did in his personal life “involves a minimisation of his job”. The implication here is that everything we do must be subjected to the image desired by the people we work for. The implication here is that we are employees first and humans second. Talk about selling your soul....
This brings to mind something I read about recently. A school principle was recently fired, in spite of the fact that under her reign the scores & performance of students had improved, because she used heroin. Is what she does at home really more important than her performance when it comes to work. Further more, considering that she managed to get results, maybe we should be giving drugs to the other teachers. But I digress....
Kelly drones on with ignorance. “Isn’t it hypocrisy to keep a president in office for behaviour that would get a teacher fired? Might employees of publicly traded corporations such as CC, that target advertising at young consumers, be held to that same standard as teachers?” No. I think that is pretty simple. First off, we make a false comparison again. The president is employed by “the people”. A teacher is employed by a company. The company has no business concerning matters of private behaviour & belief. The president (I will avoid the discussion of what the real purpose of the president is under the Constitution) is a representative of the nation and should be held to whatever standards the nation wants to set. The teacher should be held to the standards set by the company. Those are not necessarily the same standards, and the standards for the teacher are not the concern of the nation, only of her company, the children she teaches and the parents of those children.
Second, CC targets “young consumers” so this means... what exactly? Say I work for a company that makes dildos, do I have to use one? What if I am a journalist and I write an article that is published in a gay magazine. Do I have to have sex with a man? If I work for a tobacco company do I have to smoke? What if I can baby food? Box tampons? I mean seriously, what the fuck kind of logic is this?
Believing morality is controlled by “the company” is just as sick as believing morality is controlled by “the government”. At this point you may be thinking of religion in this mix also. Let me really shock your dumb ass. Religion can dictate morality. Here is the difference for the dumb people (that means you). A religion is something you join, because you want to, not something forced upon you (government) or something you are forced to do because you must pay the government not to put you in jail or kill you & because the barter system is illegal due the fact it can’t be taxed (job). When one accepts the beliefs of a religion one understands that having a set of moral codes is part of this arrangement. You can join & leave religions as you choose. You are stuck with jobs until you find another one. You are stuck with governments until you overthrow them.
Then we get a choice quote from Thomas Szasz, professor emeritus of psychiatry at the State University of New York Medical Centre. “No employer in his right mind would have hired this guy a hundred years ago . . .” This is totally absurd. These people are creating some strange past where everyone was like the Cleaver family. Exactly the opposite is true. One hundred years ago no one would give a crap that he had naked pictures of himself. One hundred years ago we didn’t have witch hunts for homosexuals, child abusers, spouse beaters, drug users or any thing else such as that. Thomas Jefferson & George Washington grew hemp. Benjamin Franklin was well know for his inability to resist the temptation of the younger ladies (go Ben, go -- you ‘da man). One hundred years ago what people did at home was their own business. It is only here & now under our politically correct police state that what you do on your time becomes the concern of the people you work for. You’ll find more on this subject later in this essay.
Linda Hudson, a sick bitch, licensed counsellor, family therapist and board member of the Atlanta-based National Council of Sex Addiction, is then allowed to waste ink. (And remember, people like the NCSA are just like homeless advocates & the like. The Homeless advocates do not seek to find homes for homeless people. If there were no homeless, they are out of a job. If the NCSA doesn’t seek out & find “sex addiction” then they will be out of a job, thus it behoves them to create problems where they don’t exist.) “In my experience it’s pretty difficult to have any kind of separation between public and private life.” Huh? Maybe for you, not for us normal people. There are hundreds of things I do in private which I have never done in public (such as typing this essay with a cigar in my mouth, totally naked, listening to Cheap Trick). “If you put photographs on the world wide web, that’s a pretty good clue that this man is an exhibitionist.” So what? What is wrong with that? Exhibitionism is evil now? I’ve seen people having sex in public & it doesn’t bother me. I applaud their daring & cunning. But then again, I’m not sexually repressed like Linda. Linda, you need to have an orgasm & a smile.
“This man may not be having problems exposing himself at work but, in a sex-addiction model, we would say the behaviour and thinking pattern is distorted and the lines get so blurry it’s a constant process of trying to get back into the moment.” Now I’m not really sure what that psychobable means, but I know what it’s leading to. It’s part of the process where we turn anything we don’t like into a mental illness. Homosexual? It’s a mental illness. Gambling? Mental illness. Enjoy sex? Mental illness. Don’t mind strangers looking at (gasp) your naked body? Mental illness. Do you blame them however? This very same method worked wonders for the powers that be in the former workers paradise known as the Soviet Union.
It seems that Insight contacted the man who posted these photos. He wasn’t ashamed by what he did & didn’t kiss their asses or beg forgiveness. In fact, when Insight asked him for a photo to use in their article he responded: “If you are going to do this to me, then I think you should have the guts to use one of the nude pictures.” Damn straight, rock on brother.

Now let’s talk about one of my favourite subjects -- statistics. Once again I have to plug one of the most important books ever written. How to Lie with Statistics, Darrell Huff, WW Norton publishing, ISBN 0-393-31072-8. If you ever want me to stop calling you stupid you have to read this book. Well, I should be honest. I’m sure I’ll still call you stupid as most of you will not be smart enuf to understand it. But anyhowz....
There is a class of information which I refer to as “meaningless statistics”, also known as “bull shit” and “the obvious, if you don’t have your head so far up your ass you can’t tell if it’s day or night”.
Some examples:
Statistic -- there are more automobile accidents in Texas, therefore, Texas is a bad place to drive. The truth: 1. Texas is the largest state, other than Alaska, and has more miles of road than any other state. 2. Texas has one of the largest populations of the states. 3. Texas has a high level of auto ownership compared to population (for example, many people who live in NY City don’t have cars, don’t need ‘em -- taxies & public transport).
So, we have more road, more people and more vehicles than any other state. So, naturally we have more automobile accidents. Now, if you don’t have your head tucked away, this is the obvious. Numericly, there are more accidents in Texas, so that is how the information is presented. When prsented as a percentage -- based on population, number of automobiles, miles of road, etc -- you see nothing unusual is happening.
Another automotive statistic that I love. An accident is more likely to happen within 5 miles of your home, so that is where it is most dangerous to drive. The truth? Nearly every time you use your car at some point you are within 5 miles of your home. After all, you live at home. Probably you are driving either to your home, or from your home. Compare this to how often you are driving 100 miles from home. Since most of your auto time is within 5 miles of home, naturally most accidents are going to occur within, you guessed it, 5 miles of your home, as opposed to 100 miles from your home. This statistic means exactly nothing.
Now that I have set the mood, let’s look at a few popular and meaningless statistics. One place where the lies are getting wild is from the anti-tobacco nazis. One of their TV commercials states that tobacco companies target teenagers because 80% (or some similar silly number) of all smokers started smoking when they were (gasp) teens. Really? No shit? Let’s think about this. Did you know that 80% of all automobile accidents were caused by people who started driving when they were teens? Did you know that 80% of all DUI cases involve people who started drinking when they were teens? Did you know, that 80% of rapes are committed by people who first had sex when they were, you guessed it, teens. Did you know that 80% of people who are too stupid to realise that most of our habits & beliefs, no matter what they are, came into being between the ages of 11 and 19, are idiots now, and were idiots when they were teens?
Another great one was spouted to me a few weeks ago. “Violence is more likely to happen within the family than anyplace else.” This is of course intended to prove that the “nuclear family” is the source of all evil and must be destroyed. (Side note, once again I ask the question: If being married is so terrible, why do homosexuals want to get married? Could it involve... money?) Let’s check this astounding discovery out:
So, you are more likely to be physically abused by someone in your immediate family than.... who? A New York street gang? Well... I don’t know about you, but I spend more time with my family than I do with street gangs. Most of us don’t spend large amounts of time around people who are going to hurt us, unless we have to -- such as living with them maybe... and being dependent on them for our financial concerns. Is the average person more likely to abuse strangers on the street or the members of his family?
Secondly, we get in more heated & passionate debates with members of our family than we do with other people. If my neighbours 14 year old daughter says she is going to have the love child of a 50 year old guy with VD and run off to live with him in Mexico, why do I care? If my daughter says this to me, I’m going to beat her ass until blood runs down her legs. You don’t have to be Einstein to see thru this silliness.
So when you add it up, of course we are most likely to be abused by family members. We spend more time with them, we get in deeper debates & arguments with them, we are dependent upon them in such ways that we typically can not simply walk away. The obvious is masquerading as enlightened.

Okie dokie, hang on ‘cause I got a stack of idiocy from the local rag for you now.

Did you read my review of “Failure To Connect”? Did you read my warnings about giving little kids the internet & telling them they are smart? Well, 13 year old (with an IQ close to that) Galen Trine-McMahn (oh look, a hyphenated last name, mom must be a feminist) wrote some letters to the paper spouting off in favour of gun control. He comes up with some idiot statistics which are not the point here. The point is, he got his information from handguncontrol.org, and naturally this information showed that guns are a bad thing. What a surprise. Had he gone to NRA.com (or whatever it may be) then he would have got something completely different, but probably just as biased. And if you check out 3rdreich.com, you will find that jews, gypsies and homosexuals are the root of all evil and should be gassed. Just because you found it on the internet does that make it true? Yes, children are the future, and yes it scares me.

On the subject of the future, quick side note. Tongue piercing. You realise that you have a hole in your tongue, and since there is continuous stress on whatever you have stuck in that hole, it never really heals up. On top of that, your mouth is one of the dirtiest parts of your body (especially since for many of you it is also your ass hole -- or so it would seem based on the shit coming out). In 20 years when you are all getting infections and cancer I’m gonna laugh at you.

Back to the local rag. Ellen Goodman is ranting about the incident in NYC Central Park which occurred on National Puerto Rican Day. You know what I’m talking about, a bunch of men “molested” women by cat calling them (just today as I was walking down the street a jeep with 3 chycks stopped at a red light by a group of “boys” -- the started a massive barrage of cat calls which probably scared the doo-doo out of the chycks -- made me proud to be a man) and tearing off their clothes. So Ellen compares this incident to Tailhook (I suppose they are similar, in so much as they both involved women & men, otherwise I think she is lost) and laments that the women in the videos were “subjected to double exposure, double humiliation” when the media showed the footage on TV.
First, it was your fellow journalist who showed this video tape on national TV. How can you be shocked that people like you have no morals? This is a surprise to you?
Second, I thought women were equal. Isn’t that why you are pushing to fill the military with them. A woman can go to combat, but she can’t take care of a man who says “hey baby” and tries to pull her shirt off?
Third, it’s your type who say we don’t need weapons to protect ourselves from criminals because that is what the police are for. Well, the police came thru that day didn’t they. If one of those dumb whores would have had a Colt 45 I bet they would have left her alone.

Oh god, on the subject of dumb whores (I’m just pulling these papers out of a stack, so the order is completely random) here is some good stuff. Dear Abby is about a total idiot. I hate this chick & the bone heads who send their pea brained questions to her. Somebody, we don’t know, but it had to be a woman, was biking thru the park when she saw some bimbo in black picking lilies along the side of the path. She stopped and asked the bimbo what she was doing, the bimbo’s reply was that she was going to a funeral. So the chick on the bike let it slide, but now she is feeling guilty that she confronted the bimbo, since she was going to a funeral. Abby, help me! The brilliant response from Abby: while she was right to confront the bimbo, “I suspect you’d be feeling less guilty right now if -- once she told you about the funeral -- you had expressed your condolences for her loss and them quietly gone on your way.”
Hey, dumb whores... she was picking these for her house. That funeral story was just a line because the bimbo is smarter than you & knew you would be a sucker for it. Can you say gullible? This is why women should not be making decisions. Of course, men are just as gullible when confronted by cute babes, which is why men should not be making decisions either. Only I, future ruler of the Earth, should be allowed to make decisions. The rest of you in-duh-viduals are dolts.

Robert Cluster from Fort Collins wrote a wonder piece which has been reproduced in the local rag and the Fort Collins’ Forum. Robert once worked as a census taker and lets us in on a few of the dirty secrets about how they operate & what they do. But the one thing he brings up that is really important is this. We all know that the census information is not suppose to be shared with any other government agency. Yet, as Robert points out, when WWII started it didn’t take long to round up & imprison a few hundred thousand Japanese-Americans. Hmmm, ever wonder how they knew where to find those Americans of Japanese decent? I will leave it to you sheep to ponder that.

Once in a great while, common sense rules. A “soldier” (woman) at Fort Carson CO who refused to take the anthrax vaccine (“illegal and could endanger her ability to have children”) is being discharged and a federal judge refused to block the discharge. Thank god. First off, women are equal. Since the vaccine is legal to give to men and does not affect their ability to have children, the same must be true of women. But more importantly is the stupidity of you civilians and military dolts who do not understand the following concept.
When you join the military they own your body. It is theirs. The government gave me an experimental vaccine when I was in. You don’t see my crying. Actually, it was some bad stuff. I wasn’t sick a single day for years & years. The cunts’ leach, I mean the ladies lawyer said “She wasn’t informed of her constitutional rights”. There is a reason for that. When you join the military you are no longer an American citizen. You are no longer protected by the Constitution. You are subject to the UCMJ, Uniform Code of Military Justice. That is it. You have no rights other than thoes granted by your superiors. Her husband has already been given a less-than-honourable discharge for refusing the anthrax vaccine, now she will be joining him. The cunt wanted an honourable discharge so she could get military benefits (why, you didn’t fullfill your obligation, you don’t deserve them) and have a good record to show prospective employers (I think they deserve to know just what a dumb, whiny whore they are hiring -- besides, in some cases being a liberal whiny bitch will be what gets her the job).

Okie... Here it is. More of the Dear Abby dumbness. Now these are great. Geez, how can I condense this story... it’s just too ripe, but I must try. A dumb whore & a guy desperate enuf for sex to marry her were on their honeymoon in French Polynesia with 3 other newly wed couples of idiots. “Some older people were there also.” Oh my god, old people??!!?? “We considered them intruders and were pretty rotten to them.” The dumb whore (TDW) goes on to list the ways including “made fun of their bodies”. Flash forward 6 years to today. TDW spends a weekend each year with her father at a big birthday bash he throws (in other words, she continues to leech off of him) and this year finally figured out that one of her fathers yearly guest is one of these disgusting old people she & her idiot husband were degrading 6 years ago. “She must have recognised us long ago, but said nothing.” “My father knows something is wrong, but I can’t bring myself to tell him. I have always been his favourite and would not want him to think I am such a rotten person. How do I get out of this.”
Abby of course tosses out some shit, but she gets one thing right. “There is no way to get out of this. So grow up, fess up, and apologise.” Well, almost right anyhowz. Tell your father just what sort of person you really are. He will probably still love you, since as a parent he is blind to the faults of his children, but fact is this: TDW, you are just a sorry sack of shit. It’s that simple. You should feel bad about how you behaved, in fact I think you couldn’t possibly feel bad enuf. When you are old, I hope your children disown you (if you have any, since the worn out & stretched cunt of a whore like you might not be tight enuf to keep a fetus inside of it for 9 months), and I hope everyone around you treats you like shit and makes fun of you, especially since that loose, saggy ass body of yours can only get worse. And you don’t want Daddy to know how pathetic you are why? Because you will break his heart? Or because you don’t want to get cut out of the will? I hope your husband gets in an accident and becomes a mental & physical cripple. Maybe cleaning up the shit of a vegetable in a wheelchair for the rest of your life will teach you some humility. But then, I’m giving you too much credit in the intelligence department aren’t I?

Now, this one is sooooooo true. Long story short, some chick asked her husband if the outfit she was wearing looked OK. Naturally, being a man, he told the truth. “I don’t like those pants.” Oh my god..... Now first off, think just what kind of a loser you would have to be to write to Dear Abby about this. Now, read the rest of her letter. “I was really ticked off. And then he got mad at me for asking him what he thought and getting mad at his answer. [as he should have done, ‘cause you are dumb] I can understand this logically [fat chance, almost as fat as you are]; however, I can’t imagine giving anyone the same answer he did to that question [that’s because, as a woman, lying comes natural to you]. It was a rude and unhelpful thing to say [you asked] and it hurt my feelings [indicating you are a bit too fragile to be alive]. It was too late for me to change -- and why should I change just because he doesn’t like the pants [he didn’t ask you to change, he answered your question]? It’s not like I have an unlimited wardrobe [right, and you only have 3 pair of shoes also]. Now every time I wear those pants, I’ll know that he doesn’t like them [so if it bothers you, why are you wearing them again]. I guess the bottom line is, I was looking for an affirmation about how I looked, and he didn’t give me one [i was looking for him to kiss my ass, but he had an opinion of his own and that is not what i wanted]. Am I being too sensitive [yes], or is he speaking his mind too much?”
Let’s face it, if he were speaking his mind even half enuf he would be talking to a lawyer about getting rid of a psychotic dip-shit like you. Is your last name Laymen?
Remember, when a woman tells you she likes honest men, she is a lier.

Ah, gun control. Add to that topic ignorance of history, ignorance of government, and yes.... the main topic it seems of this essay (really, you may not believe me, but I know that men are just as stupid as women) ...add a dumb whore. What do you get, you get Amy Antommaria, local Fort Collins dumb whore who got her idiot words printed in the local rag. Let me quote the fun part:
“The very people calling themselves defenders of the Second Amendment are the people most uninformed about our government. In fact, many have a basic distrust bordering on hatred for our government, seeing it as an enemy, rather than a brilliant system used by all. These same people advocate stockpiling weapons in our homes in order to fight off our tyrannical government. Does anyone else see the hypocrisy?”
“In order to get gun-control laws, we will have to call out loud an clear, past the uninformed rhetoric.”
Nice try Amy, but honestly, you are so god-dammed stupid.
1. The defenders of the 2nd Amendment are not uninformed about government, in fact they, unlike you, have probably read the Constitution. Which is how they know that most of the laws passed by the federal government are unconstitutional. It’s in the 10th Amendment, the one you are not familiar with. This is why we distrust the government.
2. The reason we hate the government can be seen by looking at the graves of those in died in ‘Nam & Korea, by remembering Waco, by the death of Vicky Weaver as she was shot in the head while holding an assault baby in her arms by a government stormtrooper and finally, by the fact that on the day of the Oklahoma City bombing none of the ATF agents who worked in that building showed up for work. Oh wait, that was just a coincidence.
3. “The hypocrisy?” I don’t see any at all. The Constitution is not the government, I don’t fear the Constitution, I fear the Amerikan Gestapo. Yes, I do intend to defend myself. Unlike you, when the government comes to kill me I don’t intend to go peaceably for the good of your fellow man. I’m takin’ a few with me.
4. “Uninformed rhetoric?” Would that be like...... your mindless words?
And finally, as all liberals do, we are called upon to just do it “for the children” which is what all liberals drag out when they can’t think of anything better to say. I am doing it for the children Amy. So that the children of today can have freedom tomorrow I would put you in a gas chamber and turn the valve. Idiots like your are the most dangerous threat of all.

Finally, something that is not about dumb whores.... Even I was getting tired of that.
Newspaper head line: “Survey suggest ethics remain difficult issue for employees.” Even when the newspaper gets it right, they still get it wrong. The employees have no problem with ethics -- in fact, as you will soon see, more than 50% of the employees know exactly what is going on. Here are the survey highlights:
“Of those who said they saw misconduct, 49% consider it serious enough to considerable damage public trust in their company if it ever became public knowledge.”
“57% of workers interviewed say management does not know the extent of bad behaviour that goes on in the company” I say management is the source of much of it, and chooses to be blind to most of the rest.
“61% of those asked suspect their employer would dole out lesser discipline to higher-ups caught doing something unethical or illegal than they would to ordinary workers.”
“More than half, 53%, of the employees surveyed said their bosses would not protect them from retaliation.”
Now, allow me to point out the obvious. The headline says “ethics remain difficult issue for employees”. Hey, dumb fucks, the employees know what is ethical -- well, over 50% of those surveyed do -- if you take a look at these results you will see that the employees can clearly spot the ethics problems -- and they are in management. Like this is news? You can tell reporters don’t have real jobs. That’s why Gannett News Service thought this was worthy of a story.

The 1 - 7 June issue of Westword (westword.com) has a cover story called “Death by SUV”. Those of you who know me are aware that I am no fan of the SUV, tho what I hate worse is the cell phone attached idiot behind the wheel of a SUV that will never leave the pavement. As a libertarian I have no desire to ban SUVs or any of this other goofy stuff that some people are coming up with, but once again I would like to make a few points about these monsters. Westword undertook “an extensive study of SUV mishaps in Colorado”. Among their findings:
In 1999, 28% of the accidents surveyed involved SUVs - twice what would have been expected based on the number of SUVs on the road.
12% of SUV accidents were weather related, compared to 10% for all other vehicles.
In 1997 fatal accidents, SUVs rolled 48% of the time -- a higher percentage than any other auto type. Figures from 1999 show that out of 46 fatal SUV accidents investigated from that year, 30 of them were single-vehicle crashes, with 23 of those (77%) involving a rollover.
What can we draw from this? The same thing that I have always said. While SUVs are safer in some ways (better chance of surviving a head on collision) they are less safe in other ways (better chance of dying in a side impact & better chance or rollover). What is the root source of this? You. Yes, you. The dumb ass driving. Your cell phone in your ear, Starbucks in your hand, head up your ass self.
Let us examine the stupidity. First off, you idiots think that 4 wheel drive somehow gives you more traction in ice & snow. This of course indicates that you have no clue how the wheel works. See, the wheel is able to move mass from one place to another because there is friction between the wheel and the surface it is acting upon. When there is ice on the road, there is no friction. Having 4 wheels spinning instead of 2 wheels does not increase the amount of friction between the wheel and the road. I quote a quote from the Westword article:
State Trooper George Rezabek: “There was a two-day ice storm that turned Monument Hill into an ice-skating rink you wouldn’t believe, and every time I’d go there during the storm, nothing would be off the road except SUVs -- and they’d all be on their roof. These people would think that because they were in a larger vehicle with four-wheel drive they could go faster safer and stop faster safer in those conditions. But they couldn’t.”
Duh.
Captain Steve Smee of the Colorado State Patrol: “A lot of people aren’t use to driving a larger vehicle, and they believe those ads that show SUVs bursting through snowbanks and so forth. But even in four-wheel drive, SUVs don’t stop any faster than other vehicles. In fact, most of them take longer to stop because they are so heavy. That’s why, when bad weather hits, so many of them end up in a ditch.”
Hold on... you dip shits really need to be told that a heavier vehicle takes longer to stop than a lighter one? For those of you who want to ban SUVs, let me point out that you are on the wrong track. What we need to do is take the drivers license away from the stupid people. SUVs don’t kill people, dumb asses kill people.
And, while we are on the subject... Did you see what Caption Smee said. “...they believe the ads that show SUVs bursting through snowbanks and so forth.” So, they see it on TV, do it, and it kills them. Hmmmm.... just like when you see a commercial for, oh say, cigarettes, and do like the commercial, and die. But wait! We are trying to ban cigarette advertising because it kills. Hello! Stupid fuckers! SUV advertising kills!. How many children have been killed because “big SUV executives” don’t have any morals. Where is the protest, where is the ad campaign, where are all the freaks claiming to “tell the truth”?
Yea, that’s what I thought. Greed is only bad when certain people are engaging in it. Did you know that the profit margin on SUVs can be over $15,000? Wondering how this is possible? It’s because SUVs don’t have any R&D cost. See, most SUVs are pickups with a different body on them. In fact, some SUVs are station wagons with a different body. As I have long pointed out to “cool people”, you are driving a station wagon with big tires.
Of course, due to all the attention being drawn to this fact; Big Auto is starting to improve SUVs and make them safer, much like Big Tobacco is making amends. Of course the difference is that no one is trying to get money for past damages out of Big Auto. Probably because Big Auto has given more money to Big Lawyers and Big Government, and let us not forget Big Union. Good thing we have so many Big Idiots with Big Double Standards and their Big Heads up their Big Asses.

Mean while, back at the ranch --

Remember back when East Germany passed a law that if you wanted to leave the city you had to pay $20,000, or be shot in the back if you tried to leave “illegally” by jumping the wall? Well, seems that now if you wish to renounce your US citizenship and leave the “home of the free” in addition to the fact that you have to continue to pay US income tax for the next 10 years, the Klinton administration is going to add a new, one time tax, which they expect will raise $2,000,000,000 to $2,900,000,000 over the next 10 years. If it’s the home of the free, why do we have to pay for the privilege of leaving?

The Texas Department of Public Safety reports that the 211,769 Texans carrying concealed handguns are about eight time less (yes, it says less) likely to be arrested for crimes than the general population. Don’t tell the anti-weapon wackos. Or Galen Trine-McMahn.

Crisis for the federal Access Board with the ADA. Seems that deaf people can’t hear fire alarms, so they require strobe lights. Seems the strobe lights can cause seizures in epileptics. So, do we keep the stobes and let the epileptics spaz out & burn up? Do we get rid of the stobes and let the deaf people burn up? How ‘bout we hire people who fall into neither category to follow the deaf & the epileptic around the rest of their lives to warn them of fire? Where it stops, no one knows.

Great quote from a great leader of the feminist movement. Time magazine reporter (objective & unbiased as are all members of Big Media) Nina Burleigh in the New York Observer: “I would be happy to give [Clinton] a blow job just to thank him for keeping abortion legal . . . American women should be lining up with their presidential kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.” Of course, what would she know about being on her back? Nina will never need an abortion, because to need an abortion, you have to get pregnant. To get pregnant, you have to have sex. To have sex, you have to be attractive to a man. As I said, why would she need an abortion? Think about it guys, have you ever seen a woman at a pro-abortion rally that you would fuck?

Tobacco settlement money goes to where it’s needed most in Los Angeles. Paying out at least $125 million in settlements against the corrupt police department, and making the city’s sidewalks wheelchair accessible to comply with the ADA.

Boca Raton, Florida, already bars police and fire-fighters from smoking, on the job and off the job. Now it wants to extend the ban to the entire 1,100 person city work force. Workers caught smoking, even at home, would be fired. Sing with me, “the land of the free...”

Athens, Georgia, is reportedly considering a ban on hiring workers with high cholesterol. Sing with me, “the land of the free...”

Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Police suspected some teens of underage drinking, but the teens were not fessing up and the cops didn’t have a warrant. Says District Attorney Paul Bucher, forget the legal niceties. If the police suspect underage drinking, go right in. No warrant needed. Sing with me, “the land of the free...”

New England Journal of Medicine, 23 March: A vegan went blind due to vitamin B-12 deficiency. Thirty-three years old, and 100% blind. So, humans are not designed to eat meat? I wonder, if he gets a seeing eye dog, is this animal exploitation?

The smartest thing said yet about the 2000 presidential campaign, by Fidel Castro non the less. “Perhaps never in times so complex and chaotic . . . has there been a competition between two candidates more boring and insipid.” I say we give Fidel a talk show on CNN.